https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124475 Repeated non-appearance after several opportunities, together with an uncontroverted statement showing that the appeal memo was not signed or authorised by the principal appellant, justified dismissal of the excise appeals for want of prosecution. The Tribunal treated the conduct as a lack of bona fides and a dilatory use of the appellate process, and dismissed the connected condonation and stay applications as well. en-us Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 29 Sep 2012 17:02:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124475 Repeated non-appearance after several opportunities, together with an uncontroverted statement showing that the appeal memo was not signed or authorised by the principal appellant, justified dismissal of the excise appeals for want of prosecution. The Tribunal treated the conduct as a lack of bona fides and a dilatory use of the appellate process, and dismissed the connected condonation and stay applications as well. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124475