<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 424 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124474</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption granted to the Respondents under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. for pipes used beyond the first storage point in a Water Treatment Plant. They found that the unamended Notification did not restrict the exemption to the first storage point, contrary to the Department&#039;s argument. The Tribunal dismissed all 30 Appeals filed by the Department, emphasizing the need to interpret the Notification&#039;s language accurately and granting exemption based on compliance with its conditions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:58:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 424 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124474</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the exemption granted to the Respondents under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. for pipes used beyond the first storage point in a Water Treatment Plant. They found that the unamended Notification did not restrict the exemption to the first storage point, contrary to the Department&#039;s argument. The Tribunal dismissed all 30 Appeals filed by the Department, emphasizing the need to interpret the Notification&#039;s language accurately and granting exemption based on compliance with its conditions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124474</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>