<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 423 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124473</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to enhance the value of imported goods, which had been set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals). The decision was based on the specifics of the contract for uneven yarn, potential wastage during production, and the inapplicability of comparison data for smaller quantities. The Tribunal found no merit in Revenue&#039;s arguments, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:52:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161419" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 423 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124473</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed Revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to enhance the value of imported goods, which had been set aside by the Commissioner (Appeals). The decision was based on the specifics of the contract for uneven yarn, potential wastage during production, and the inapplicability of comparison data for smaller quantities. The Tribunal found no merit in Revenue&#039;s arguments, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124473</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>