<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 419 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124469</link>
    <description>The application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order dated 4-3-2008 was rejected by the Judge. The Judge found that the alleged mistake did not fall within the scope of the relevant legal provision and that the omission of the ex parte order from 2007 was not considered a mistake apparent on the face of the record. Therefore, the request for recall and modification of the Final Order was dismissed on 21-10-2008.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:35:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 419 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124469</link>
      <description>The application for rectification of mistake in the Final Order dated 4-3-2008 was rejected by the Judge. The Judge found that the alleged mistake did not fall within the scope of the relevant legal provision and that the omission of the ex parte order from 2007 was not considered a mistake apparent on the face of the record. Therefore, the request for recall and modification of the Final Order was dismissed on 21-10-2008.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>