<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 418 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124468</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported waveguides under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 854420 as cables, following precedents where waveguides were considered part of the microwave system rather than radiotelephony equipment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the classification under CTH 854420 was consistent with previous decisions and there was no justification to deviate from this established classification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:32:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 418 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124468</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the classification of imported waveguides under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 854420 as cables, following precedents where waveguides were considered part of the microwave system rather than radiotelephony equipment. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal, stating that the classification under CTH 854420 was consistent with previous decisions and there was no justification to deviate from this established classification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124468</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>