<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 416 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124466</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, affirming the confiscation of goods valued at Rs.29,68,861.50 and imposition of a penalty of Rs.1.50 lakhs due to the deliberate misdeclaration of imported goods to evade customs duty. The appellant&#039;s claims of negotiating a reduced price with the supplier and seeking leniency were rejected, with the Tribunal finding the misdeclaration as intentional to import high-rated items as low-rated items. The Tribunal deemed the redemption fine and penalty justified based on the value of the goods and the duty evasion attempt, ultimately ruling in favor of the Respondent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:19:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161412" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 416 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124466</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision, affirming the confiscation of goods valued at Rs.29,68,861.50 and imposition of a penalty of Rs.1.50 lakhs due to the deliberate misdeclaration of imported goods to evade customs duty. The appellant&#039;s claims of negotiating a reduced price with the supplier and seeking leniency were rejected, with the Tribunal finding the misdeclaration as intentional to import high-rated items as low-rated items. The Tribunal deemed the redemption fine and penalty justified based on the value of the goods and the duty evasion attempt, ultimately ruling in favor of the Respondent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124466</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>