<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 666 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124443</link>
    <description>Territorial jurisdiction under central excise could not be extended beyond the notified commissionerate to cover offshore work carried out beyond its limits, so the adjudication was without jurisdiction. A radar station/platform assembled on site and embedded in the seabed, which would become scrap on dismantling and could not be reassembled elsewhere, was treated as immovable property and not excisable goods. The demand was also held time-barred because the relevant period exceeded the normal limitation and no suppression or valid basis for extended limitation was established. The assessee was therefore entitled to relief on all examined grounds.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:28:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161389" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 666 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124443</link>
      <description>Territorial jurisdiction under central excise could not be extended beyond the notified commissionerate to cover offshore work carried out beyond its limits, so the adjudication was without jurisdiction. A radar station/platform assembled on site and embedded in the seabed, which would become scrap on dismantling and could not be reassembled elsewhere, was treated as immovable property and not excisable goods. The demand was also held time-barred because the relevant period exceeded the normal limitation and no suppression or valid basis for extended limitation was established. The assessee was therefore entitled to relief on all examined grounds.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124443</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>