<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 654 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124431</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It was found that the Appellant had paid duty on exempted goods, did not retain collected amounts, and thus the provision did not apply. The Tribunal cited relevant case law and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:53:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 654 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124431</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Appellant, setting aside the penalty imposed under Section 11D of the Central Excise Act, 1944. It was found that the Appellant had paid duty on exempted goods, did not retain collected amounts, and thus the provision did not apply. The Tribunal cited relevant case law and allowed the appeal with consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>