<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 652 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124429</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellants, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The case involved the denial of input duty credit and interest demand under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, due to delayed return of duty-paid inputs for rectification. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the rules for claiming and utilizing input duty credit, absolving the appellants from the obligation to reverse credit or pay interest on inputs returned within the prescribed period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:32:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161376" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 652 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124429</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI ruled in favor of the appellants, granting a waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery. The case involved the denial of input duty credit and interest demand under the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, due to delayed return of duty-paid inputs for rectification. The Tribunal emphasized adherence to the rules for claiming and utilizing input duty credit, absolving the appellants from the obligation to reverse credit or pay interest on inputs returned within the prescribed period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124429</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>