<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 772 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124426</link>
    <description>Captive consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE was available for a control panel used in manufacturing an automatic waste evacuation system cleared in CKD condition and assembled at the buyer&#039;s site. The Revenue argued that the panel lost its captive-use character because integration occurred only after removal from the factory, but the system had already been accepted as manufactured in the assessee&#039;s factory and removed on payment of duty. On that basis, the control panel was treated as captively consumed for manufacture of the dutiable final product, and the exemption claim succeeded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Aug 2017 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161373" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 772 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124426</link>
      <description>Captive consumption exemption under Notification No. 67/95-CE was available for a control panel used in manufacturing an automatic waste evacuation system cleared in CKD condition and assembled at the buyer&#039;s site. The Revenue argued that the panel lost its captive-use character because integration occurred only after removal from the factory, but the system had already been accepted as manufactured in the assessee&#039;s factory and removed on payment of duty. On that basis, the control panel was treated as captively consumed for manufacture of the dutiable final product, and the exemption claim succeeded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>