<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 770 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124423</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning orders demanding differential duty and penalties for selling imported electronic goods at higher prices. Relying on High Court decisions, including the Madras High Court, it was determined that the Standards of Weights &amp;amp; Measures Act does not apply to electronic goods like radios and televisions. Consequently, the demand for duty and penalties was deemed unjustified, leading to the relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2012 12:10:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 770 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124423</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning orders demanding differential duty and penalties for selling imported electronic goods at higher prices. Relying on High Court decisions, including the Madras High Court, it was determined that the Standards of Weights &amp;amp; Measures Act does not apply to electronic goods like radios and televisions. Consequently, the demand for duty and penalties was deemed unjustified, leading to the relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124423</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>