<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 743 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124395</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in a case involving a dispute over the valuation of goods sold between related parties, M/s Him Teknoforge Ltd. and M/s Him Gears (P) Ltd. The Tribunal found that the prices charged between the two entities were not undervalued, as they were comparable to those charged to independent buyers and in line with market norms. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the sales were not undervalued and that the companies operated independently, thus upholding the valuation of goods sold between them.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 17:17:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161343" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 743 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124395</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi ruled in a case involving a dispute over the valuation of goods sold between related parties, M/s Him Teknoforge Ltd. and M/s Him Gears (P) Ltd. The Tribunal found that the prices charged between the two entities were not undervalued, as they were comparable to those charged to independent buyers and in line with market norms. The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeals, affirming the Commissioner (Appeals) decision that the sales were not undervalued and that the companies operated independently, thus upholding the valuation of goods sold between them.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124395</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>