https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124393 The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision to reject the refund claim filed by M/s. Suraj Marble Pvt. Ltd. based on the finality of earlier legal proceedings concerning clandestine removal. Despite arguments citing precedents like Aman Marble Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized its limited jurisdiction and inability to overturn the Supreme Court's conclusive order confirming duty demand against the appellants. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's case, stating that refunding the duty would contradict the earlier confirmed demand. en-us Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Sep 2012 16:58:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124393 The Tribunal upheld the lower authorities' decision to reject the refund claim filed by M/s. Suraj Marble Pvt. Ltd. based on the finality of earlier legal proceedings concerning clandestine removal. Despite arguments citing precedents like Aman Marble Industries Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal emphasized its limited jurisdiction and inability to overturn the Supreme Court's conclusive order confirming duty demand against the appellants. The Tribunal found no merit in the appellant's case, stating that refunding the duty would contradict the earlier confirmed demand. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124393