https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124383 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowed the appeal for remand to re-evaluate the refund claim of Rs. 25,64,678/- concerning sugar clearance under specific notifications. The decision highlighted the importance of considering unjust enrichment and complying with clearance requirements, emphasizing the application of Section 11B in pending proceedings. The case underscored the significance of adhering to legal provisions and principles in resolving duty refund claims effectively. en-us Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:46:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124383 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and allowed the appeal for remand to re-evaluate the refund claim of Rs. 25,64,678/- concerning sugar clearance under specific notifications. The decision highlighted the importance of considering unjust enrichment and complying with clearance requirements, emphasizing the application of Section 11B in pending proceedings. The case underscored the significance of adhering to legal provisions and principles in resolving duty refund claims effectively. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124383