<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (4) TMI 636 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124380</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty liability imposed on the appellants for the destruction of expired medicines without specific permission under Central Excise law. Despite not receiving authorization from the competent authority, the appellants proceeded with the destruction in the presence of FDA, emphasizing the unsuitability of the expired drugs for human consumption. The Tribunal criticized the delay in granting permission, attributing responsibility to the Revenue for withholding authorization. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, absolving them of duty liability and providing consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2017 09:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161328" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (4) TMI 636 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124380</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the duty liability imposed on the appellants for the destruction of expired medicines without specific permission under Central Excise law. Despite not receiving authorization from the competent authority, the appellants proceeded with the destruction in the presence of FDA, emphasizing the unsuitability of the expired drugs for human consumption. The Tribunal criticized the delay in granting permission, attributing responsibility to the Revenue for withholding authorization. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, absolving them of duty liability and providing consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>