<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 606 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124375</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order, emphasizing the importance of following the statutory appeal process. The court held that while the tax levy on immovable properties might be illegal, it was not without jurisdiction. It rejected the petitioner&#039;s arguments on time-barred demands and jurisdiction, stating that the petitioner should pursue the alternate remedy of appeal for a comprehensive review of the assessment merits. The court found no violation of natural justice in the assessment process and concluded that the petitioner failed to justify bypassing the statutory appeal process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 15:15:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161323" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 606 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124375</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition challenging an assessment order, emphasizing the importance of following the statutory appeal process. The court held that while the tax levy on immovable properties might be illegal, it was not without jurisdiction. It rejected the petitioner&#039;s arguments on time-barred demands and jurisdiction, stating that the petitioner should pursue the alternate remedy of appeal for a comprehensive review of the assessment merits. The court found no violation of natural justice in the assessment process and concluded that the petitioner failed to justify bypassing the statutory appeal process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124375</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>