<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 396 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124368</link>
    <description>Excise liability attaches to the manufacturer of goods, not to a trader or procurer who merely supplies raw materials for job work. Where shopkeepers did not themselves process the goods and the actual manufacture was carried out by unidentified processors, the scheme of Rule 7 and Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not support recovery from the shopkeepers. Duty could be fastened only on the manufacturer-processor, so the demand against the shopkeepers was not recoverable and the challenge to restore the original demand failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 14:33:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 396 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124368</link>
      <description>Excise liability attaches to the manufacturer of goods, not to a trader or procurer who merely supplies raw materials for job work. Where shopkeepers did not themselves process the goods and the actual manufacture was carried out by unidentified processors, the scheme of Rule 7 and Rule 9(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 did not support recovery from the shopkeepers. Duty could be fastened only on the manufacturer-processor, so the demand against the shopkeepers was not recoverable and the challenge to restore the original demand failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>