<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 604 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124345</link>
    <description>Refund of a pre-deposit depended on verification of the factual position as to whether the amount had been paid in cash or by debiting the Modvat credit account. The CESTAT directed the original adjudicating authority to verify that factual basis before determining the correct mode of refund, and disposed of the rectification application accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 11:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161294" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 604 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124345</link>
      <description>Refund of a pre-deposit depended on verification of the factual position as to whether the amount had been paid in cash or by debiting the Modvat credit account. The CESTAT directed the original adjudicating authority to verify that factual basis before determining the correct mode of refund, and disposed of the rectification application accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124345</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>