<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 446 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124336</link>
    <description>Regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is maintainable only when the accused is in custody; the custody requirement cannot be bypassed by relying on anticipatory bail principles. The distinction between anticipatory bail under Section 438 and regular bail under Section 439 remains material because the former is protective relief before arrest, while the latter applies after custody has attached. On the facts discussed, the court found no sufficient basis to interfere with refusal of bail, having regard to the allegations, stage of proceedings, and the limited material supporting release. The refusal of bail was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 11:20:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161285" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 446 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124336</link>
      <description>Regular bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is maintainable only when the accused is in custody; the custody requirement cannot be bypassed by relying on anticipatory bail principles. The distinction between anticipatory bail under Section 438 and regular bail under Section 439 remains material because the former is protective relief before arrest, while the latter applies after custody has attached. On the facts discussed, the court found no sufficient basis to interfere with refusal of bail, having regard to the allegations, stage of proceedings, and the limited material supporting release. The refusal of bail was therefore left undisturbed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>