https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124318 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the duty demand and penalty. The Tribunal clarified that the goods do not fall under CET 9027.00 but did not accept the contention that they fall under CET 9018.00, as they are neither instruments nor appliances used in medical, surgical, dental, or veterinary sciences but appear to be articles of plastics used in laboratories. en-us Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:32:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124318 The appeal was allowed, setting aside the duty demand and penalty. The Tribunal clarified that the goods do not fall under CET 9027.00 but did not accept the contention that they fall under CET 9018.00, as they are neither instruments nor appliances used in medical, surgical, dental, or veterinary sciences but appear to be articles of plastics used in laboratories. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124318