https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124317 The tribunal rectified a mistake by modifying the Order Numbers in a previous order to ensure accuracy. It held that the respondent's application before the Settlement Commission did not equate to an admission of guilt and did not affect their right to challenge the show cause notice. The tribunal emphasized that decisions were based on available evidence, not the application to the Settlement Commission. The tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument that the respondent's approach to the Settlement Commission constituted evidence against them, upholding decisions based on the evidence on record. en-us Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 18:26:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124317 The tribunal rectified a mistake by modifying the Order Numbers in a previous order to ensure accuracy. It held that the respondent's application before the Settlement Commission did not equate to an admission of guilt and did not affect their right to challenge the show cause notice. The tribunal emphasized that decisions were based on available evidence, not the application to the Settlement Commission. The tribunal rejected the Revenue's argument that the respondent's approach to the Settlement Commission constituted evidence against them, upholding decisions based on the evidence on record. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124317