<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 642 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124305</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant regarding the availment of 100% duty credit on specific goods. The penalty imposed was overturned, considering the appellant&#039;s genuine belief in good faith that full credit was permissible for consumables used in manufacturing final products. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of interpreting rules in good faith and considering genuine mistakes when determining liabilities under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 17:11:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161256" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 642 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124305</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant regarding the availment of 100% duty credit on specific goods. The penalty imposed was overturned, considering the appellant&#039;s genuine belief in good faith that full credit was permissible for consumables used in manufacturing final products. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of interpreting rules in good faith and considering genuine mistakes when determining liabilities under the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124305</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>