<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 637 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124300</link>
    <description>The appeals were dismissed as the tribunal found that the clearances of two factories, owned by different entities but under the control of the same individual with intertwined financial interests, should be clubbed for exemption calculation. The judgment highlighted the importance of financial control and interdependence in determining common ownership of factories for exemption purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:43:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 637 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124300</link>
      <description>The appeals were dismissed as the tribunal found that the clearances of two factories, owned by different entities but under the control of the same individual with intertwined financial interests, should be clubbed for exemption calculation. The judgment highlighted the importance of financial control and interdependence in determining common ownership of factories for exemption purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>