<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 646 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124294</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 70 days in filing, attributed solely to the Committee of Commissioners without a satisfactory explanation. Emphasizing adherence to prescribed timelines under Section 129A of the Customs Act, the Tribunal highlighted the need for valid reasons for delays in the appeal process. The judgment underscored the significance of the review process by the Committee of Commissioners and the requirement for timely appeals to the Tribunal, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal for failure to provide a justifiable explanation for the delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 16:06:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161245" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 646 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124294</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, CHENNAI dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal due to a delay of 70 days in filing, attributed solely to the Committee of Commissioners without a satisfactory explanation. Emphasizing adherence to prescribed timelines under Section 129A of the Customs Act, the Tribunal highlighted the need for valid reasons for delays in the appeal process. The judgment underscored the significance of the review process by the Committee of Commissioners and the requirement for timely appeals to the Tribunal, ultimately leading to the dismissal of the appeal for failure to provide a justifiable explanation for the delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>