<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 725 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124264</link>
    <description>CENVAT credit taken on the basis of duty-paid invoices for received inputs remained admissible where the supplier later granted a post-year-end discount, because the original assessment under those invoices had not been revised. The Tribunal applied the principle that credit validly availed in the ordinary course cannot be recovered merely due to a subsequent price adjustment by the supplier. On that reasoning, the demand for reversal of credit, together with interest and penalties, was unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:56:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161217" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 725 - CESTAT,  CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124264</link>
      <description>CENVAT credit taken on the basis of duty-paid invoices for received inputs remained admissible where the supplier later granted a post-year-end discount, because the original assessment under those invoices had not been revised. The Tribunal applied the principle that credit validly availed in the ordinary course cannot be recovered merely due to a subsequent price adjustment by the supplier. On that reasoning, the demand for reversal of credit, together with interest and penalties, was unsustainable and was set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>