<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 715 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124254</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate goods and impose a penalty for misdeclaration of value in the import of second-hand machinery. The fine and penalty amounts were reduced due to the excessive nature of the original imposition. Additionally, the Tribunal granted the importer&#039;s request for re-export of the goods based on the unsuitability of the machinery for its intended purpose.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 12:11:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 715 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124254</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner&#039;s decision to confiscate goods and impose a penalty for misdeclaration of value in the import of second-hand machinery. The fine and penalty amounts were reduced due to the excessive nature of the original imposition. Additionally, the Tribunal granted the importer&#039;s request for re-export of the goods based on the unsuitability of the machinery for its intended purpose.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124254</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>