<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 485 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124250</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the re-fixation of annual production capacity by the Commissioner, deemed the re-determination under the Compounded Levy Scheme as valid, required duty demand and interest payment by the Appellants, and waived the penalty amounts imposed on them. The Appeal was rejected except for setting aside the penalty amount, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:42:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 485 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124250</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal upheld the re-fixation of annual production capacity by the Commissioner, deemed the re-determination under the Compounded Levy Scheme as valid, required duty demand and interest payment by the Appellants, and waived the penalty amounts imposed on them. The Appeal was rejected except for setting aside the penalty amount, and the Cross Objection was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124250</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>