https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124247 The appeal against the dismissal of the adjudication order was unsuccessful. The dispute centered on whether the exported footwear should be classified as gents leather half boots or long boots. Despite the appellant's reliance on the Central Leather Research Institute report, the DGFT's classification prevailed, determining the goods as gents leather half boots. Consequently, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. en-us Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 11:30:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124247 The appeal against the dismissal of the adjudication order was unsuccessful. The dispute centered on whether the exported footwear should be classified as gents leather half boots or long boots. Despite the appellant's reliance on the Central Leather Research Institute report, the DGFT's classification prevailed, determining the goods as gents leather half boots. Consequently, the impugned order was upheld, and the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124247