<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (3) TMI 603 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124237</link>
    <description>Customer-supplied denaturants were held not to be separately includible in the assessable value of Special Denatured Spirit under Section 4 valuation principles, because the goods were sold at the factory gate on commercial terms and there was no evidence of extra-commercial consideration or flow back. The department also failed to show that the cost of the free-supplied denaturants had been omitted from the invoice-based valuation. The Tribunal further accepted that Special Denatured Spirit could not be valued merely by comparison with Ordinary Denatured Spirit, and upheld the appellate reasoning on the facts found.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (3) TMI 603 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124237</link>
      <description>Customer-supplied denaturants were held not to be separately includible in the assessable value of Special Denatured Spirit under Section 4 valuation principles, because the goods were sold at the factory gate on commercial terms and there was no evidence of extra-commercial consideration or flow back. The department also failed to show that the cost of the free-supplied denaturants had been omitted from the invoice-based valuation. The Tribunal further accepted that Special Denatured Spirit could not be valued merely by comparison with Ordinary Denatured Spirit, and upheld the appellate reasoning on the facts found.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124237</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>