https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124232 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the need for aligning proposed duties in show cause notices with confirmed duties. It found the discrepancy between proposed Central Excise duty and confirmed Customs duty to render the order legally flawed. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held that Central Excise duty should have been confirmed instead of Customs duty for goods diverted to the domestic market. The judgment underscores consistency and adherence to legal precedents in Central Excise and Customs duty matters, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellants. en-us Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 27 Sep 2012 10:17:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124232 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the need for aligning proposed duties in show cause notices with confirmed duties. It found the discrepancy between proposed Central Excise duty and confirmed Customs duty to render the order legally flawed. Citing precedents, the Tribunal held that Central Excise duty should have been confirmed instead of Customs duty for goods diverted to the domestic market. The judgment underscores consistency and adherence to legal precedents in Central Excise and Customs duty matters, setting aside the impugned order and providing consequential relief to the appellants. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124232