<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (1) TMI 788 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124227</link>
    <description>Final products were treated as exempt up to 28-2-1986, and for the period from 1-3-1986 the assessee was found entitled to deemed credit because the inputs and finished goods carried the same specific rate of duty. On that basis, the duty burden was treated as revenue neutral and the demand was held unsustainable. The text states that, as a result, no enforceable duty demand survived and consequential relief followed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:43:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161181" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (1) TMI 788 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124227</link>
      <description>Final products were treated as exempt up to 28-2-1986, and for the period from 1-3-1986 the assessee was found entitled to deemed credit because the inputs and finished goods carried the same specific rate of duty. On that basis, the duty burden was treated as revenue neutral and the demand was held unsustainable. The text states that, as a result, no enforceable duty demand survived and consequential relief followed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>