<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (12) TMI 394 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a group of companies manufacturing Texturised yarn, in a case concerning discrepancies in assessable values between central excise and commercial invoices. The Tribunal agreed with the appellants that excess freight charges should not be included in the assessable value. However, it held that brokerage to agents must be included. The Tribunal also directed rectification of a typographical error in duty demand, extension of cum-duty price benefit, and quantification of demands with specific directions, leaving the imposition of penalties for further consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 12:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161179" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (12) TMI 394 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, a group of companies manufacturing Texturised yarn, in a case concerning discrepancies in assessable values between central excise and commercial invoices. The Tribunal agreed with the appellants that excess freight charges should not be included in the assessable value. However, it held that brokerage to agents must be included. The Tribunal also directed rectification of a typographical error in duty demand, extension of cum-duty price benefit, and quantification of demands with specific directions, leaving the imposition of penalties for further consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>