<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (10) TMI 524 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on fabrics seized from the intercepted tempo due to discrepancies in documents. However, it set aside demands related to shortages in finished goods and alleged removal of processed fabrics as grey returns. The appeal was partially allowed, with the appellant succeeding on the issues of grey returns and shortages in finished stock.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 18:11:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161175" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (10) TMI 524 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the duty demand on fabrics seized from the intercepted tempo due to discrepancies in documents. However, it set aside demands related to shortages in finished goods and alleged removal of processed fabrics as grey returns. The appeal was partially allowed, with the appellant succeeding on the issues of grey returns and shortages in finished stock.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>