<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 520 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124219</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s claim that pleating of grey fabrics did not involve heat setting, concluding that pleating constituted manufacture under Central Excise duty levy. The case was remanded for a detailed examination of the pleating process to determine its nature accurately, based on expert opinions and previous Tribunal orders indicating the importance of heat application in converting grey fabrics to pleated fabrics.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:50:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161173" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 520 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124219</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the appellant&#039;s claim that pleating of grey fabrics did not involve heat setting, concluding that pleating constituted manufacture under Central Excise duty levy. The case was remanded for a detailed examination of the pleating process to determine its nature accurately, based on expert opinions and previous Tribunal orders indicating the importance of heat application in converting grey fabrics to pleated fabrics.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>