<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (9) TMI 518 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124217</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that initiating subsequent proceedings for penalties on the same offence, after penalties were already imposed in a prior order, was unnecessary. The appellant&#039;s compliance with Central Excise requirements and clarification on discrepancies led to the conclusion that imposing additional penalties was unjustified. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and all appeals were allowed with relief to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 17:37:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161171" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (9) TMI 518 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124217</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that initiating subsequent proceedings for penalties on the same offence, after penalties were already imposed in a prior order, was unnecessary. The appellant&#039;s compliance with Central Excise requirements and clarification on discrepancies led to the conclusion that imposing additional penalties was unjustified. As a result, the impugned order was set aside, and all appeals were allowed with relief to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Sep 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124217</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>