<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (4) TMI 599 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124198</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Delay Condonation petition, the appeal, and the Stay Petition due to the appellant&#039;s negligence and failure to establish bona fides for the delay in filing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely appeals, respect for the law, and the need for valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay to receive consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 16:21:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161152" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (4) TMI 599 - CESTAT,  KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124198</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Delay Condonation petition, the appeal, and the Stay Petition due to the appellant&#039;s negligence and failure to establish bona fides for the delay in filing the appeal. The judgment emphasized the importance of timely appeals, respect for the law, and the need for valid reasons for seeking condonation of delay to receive consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>