<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (3) TMI 649 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124190</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding a shortage of finished fabric and duty payment. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal and raised doubts about the actual shortages due to discrepancies in stock verification methods. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted discrepancies in the investigation and lack of proper verification, ultimately leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:55:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (3) TMI 649 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124190</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the Commissioner (Appeals) decision regarding a shortage of finished fabric and duty payment. The Tribunal found no evidence of clandestine removal and raised doubts about the actual shortages due to discrepancies in stock verification methods. The Commissioner (Appeals) noted discrepancies in the investigation and lack of proper verification, ultimately leading to the rejection of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>