https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124185 The appeal by Revenue against an Order-in-appeal allowing the respondent's appeal regarding duty demand based on an insurance claim was dismissed. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the demand raised after about five years was time-barred and not sustainable under the law. It was concluded that there was no suppression or intention to evade payment of duty by the respondent, leading to the order setting aside the liability on the respondent being upheld. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:25:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124185 The appeal by Revenue against an Order-in-appeal allowing the respondent's appeal regarding duty demand based on an insurance claim was dismissed. The Commissioner (Appeals) found that the demand raised after about five years was time-barred and not sustainable under the law. It was concluded that there was no suppression or intention to evade payment of duty by the respondent, leading to the order setting aside the liability on the respondent being upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 16 Mar 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124185