https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124180 Proforma credit under Rule 56A could not be enlarged beyond the specific period covered by the remand, so the wider claim was rejected. Entitlement to Special Excise Duty credit depended on the applicable notification for the relevant period; because that notification was not established on the record, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the original authority. The operative principle is that quantification on remand is confined to the scope of the remand, and credit claims outside that scope must be pursued separately if still maintainable. en-us Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:55:25 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124180 Proforma credit under Rule 56A could not be enlarged beyond the specific period covered by the remand, so the wider claim was rejected. Entitlement to Special Excise Duty credit depended on the applicable notification for the relevant period; because that notification was not established on the record, the matter was remanded for fresh consideration by the original authority. The operative principle is that quantification on remand is confined to the scope of the remand, and credit claims outside that scope must be pursued separately if still maintainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124180