<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (2) TMI 569 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124179</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning Orders-in-Appeal upholding duty demands and penalties imposed by Kandla Customs for a vessel&#039;s duty-free transshipment eligibility. The vessel, Tug M.T. Ruby-I, was found to be a foreign-going vessel, justifying the goods&#039; transshipment. The Tribunal deemed the duty demand and penalties unsustainable, as the vessel eventually sailed out of India and had valid transshipment permission. The decision was pronounced on 5-2-2007.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 14:54:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161135" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (2) TMI 569 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124179</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals, overturning Orders-in-Appeal upholding duty demands and penalties imposed by Kandla Customs for a vessel&#039;s duty-free transshipment eligibility. The vessel, Tug M.T. Ruby-I, was found to be a foreign-going vessel, justifying the goods&#039; transshipment. The Tribunal deemed the duty demand and penalties unsustainable, as the vessel eventually sailed out of India and had valid transshipment permission. The decision was pronounced on 5-2-2007.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124179</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>