<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 482 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124177</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand based on the Annual Capacity of Production determination under the Compounded Levy Scheme, emphasizing the importance of challenging such determinations to contest subsequent demands successfully. The appellants&#039; failure to challenge the fixed Annual Capacity of Production led to the dismissal of their appeal, as the Tribunal found the consequential demand valid due to the lack of challenge to the initial determination.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161133" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 482 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124177</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the demand based on the Annual Capacity of Production determination under the Compounded Levy Scheme, emphasizing the importance of challenging such determinations to contest subsequent demands successfully. The appellants&#039; failure to challenge the fixed Annual Capacity of Production led to the dismissal of their appeal, as the Tribunal found the consequential demand valid due to the lack of challenge to the initial determination.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>