<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 624 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124164</link>
    <description>The High Court granted interim relief to a petitioner involved in a dispute over the clearance of imported goods. The petitioner was allowed to clear consignments upon furnishing a bank guarantee for 25% of the differential duty and a bond for the balance. Both parties agreed to final adjudication of duty liability within six months. The Court directed expeditious adjudication proceedings, requiring the petitioner to keep the bank guarantee active. If proceedings exceeded six months, the bank guarantee would be discharged, with the Chief Commissioner tasked to investigate any delays. The petition was disposed of with the rule made absolute and no costs ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 12:33:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 624 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124164</link>
      <description>The High Court granted interim relief to a petitioner involved in a dispute over the clearance of imported goods. The petitioner was allowed to clear consignments upon furnishing a bank guarantee for 25% of the differential duty and a bond for the balance. Both parties agreed to final adjudication of duty liability within six months. The Court directed expeditious adjudication proceedings, requiring the petitioner to keep the bank guarantee active. If proceedings exceeded six months, the bank guarantee would be discharged, with the Chief Commissioner tasked to investigate any delays. The petition was disposed of with the rule made absolute and no costs ordered.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124164</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>