https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124147 The judgment upheld the charge of clandestine removal against the appellants for using unaccounted packing materials to pack goods without paying duty. The decision was based on the appellants' actions of utilizing packing materials for unaccounted goods. The court noted the interrelation between the present case and a pending matter against M/s. Crompton Industries, emphasizing the need for a collective decision to avoid conflicting outcomes. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a consolidated decision by the Joint Commissioner to ensure coherence in the adjudication process. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 26 Sep 2012 10:39:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124147 The judgment upheld the charge of clandestine removal against the appellants for using unaccounted packing materials to pack goods without paying duty. The decision was based on the appellants' actions of utilizing packing materials for unaccounted goods. The court noted the interrelation between the present case and a pending matter against M/s. Crompton Industries, emphasizing the need for a collective decision to avoid conflicting outcomes. The impugned order was set aside, and the matter was remanded for a consolidated decision by the Joint Commissioner to ensure coherence in the adjudication process. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 18 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124147