<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 710 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124140</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that gears and transmission shafts for motor vehicles and harvester combines should be classified under Heading 8483.90, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The penalty on the respondent was set aside due to the legal interpretation nature of the case. The decision was based on the specific design of the items and the interpretation of relevant classification rules and notes, supported by previous Tribunal decisions and a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2018 07:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161097" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 710 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124140</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that gears and transmission shafts for motor vehicles and harvester combines should be classified under Heading 8483.90, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) order. The penalty on the respondent was set aside due to the legal interpretation nature of the case. The decision was based on the specific design of the items and the interpretation of relevant classification rules and notes, supported by previous Tribunal decisions and a Supreme Court judgment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124140</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>