<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 708 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124138</link>
    <description>Service of a stay order sent by registered post was treated as effective once the despatching authority established that it had been correctly posted to the addressee, triggering the statutory presumption of deemed service. The returned envelope endorsement that no such company existed at the address did not displace that presumption on the stated facts. Because the appellants did not comply with the pre-deposit direction attached to the stay order, the statutory consequence followed and the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:45:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161095" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 708 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124138</link>
      <description>Service of a stay order sent by registered post was treated as effective once the despatching authority established that it had been correctly posted to the addressee, triggering the statutory presumption of deemed service. The returned envelope endorsement that no such company existed at the address did not displace that presumption on the stated facts. Because the appellants did not comply with the pre-deposit direction attached to the stay order, the statutory consequence followed and the appeal was dismissed for non-compliance.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>