<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 706 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124136</link>
    <description>An appeal filed with a delay of 4 months and 14 days was not entertained because the explanation based on medical treatment and hospitalisation did not adequately show that the appellant was unable to take steps after discharge. The supporting records reflected only a short period of admission and discharge, while the later delay remained unexplained. On that basis, the delay was treated as insufficiently explained and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 18:34:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 706 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124136</link>
      <description>An appeal filed with a delay of 4 months and 14 days was not entertained because the explanation based on medical treatment and hospitalisation did not adequately show that the appellant was unable to take steps after discharge. The supporting records reflected only a short period of admission and discharge, while the later delay remained unexplained. On that basis, the delay was treated as insufficiently explained and the appeal was dismissed as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124136</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>