<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 702 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124132</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the refund claim on grounds of unjust enrichment, as evidenced by gate passes showing duty recovery from customers, indicating the passing on of duty incidence. The appellants&#039; argument that the price remained unchanged before and after duty imposition was not sufficient to rebut the revenue&#039;s claim without additional financial records.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2017 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161089" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 702 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124132</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the denial of the refund claim on grounds of unjust enrichment, as evidenced by gate passes showing duty recovery from customers, indicating the passing on of duty incidence. The appellants&#039; argument that the price remained unchanged before and after duty imposition was not sufficient to rebut the revenue&#039;s claim without additional financial records.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>