<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 695 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124124</link>
    <description>Processed fabrics made from partially processed fabric inputs could qualify for deemed credit under Notification No. 29/96-C.E. (N.T.) when the inputs had suffered actual duty and were later cleared after final processing on payment of duty. The notification barred deemed credit only where Rule 57A(1) credit had been taken, except for processed fabrics received as input; read with the trade notice and Board clarification, this preserved actual duty-paid credit on partially processed fabrics while allowing deemed credit on the processed fabrics cleared. Denial of the benefit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the claimed credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:31:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 695 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124124</link>
      <description>Processed fabrics made from partially processed fabric inputs could qualify for deemed credit under Notification No. 29/96-C.E. (N.T.) when the inputs had suffered actual duty and were later cleared after final processing on payment of duty. The notification barred deemed credit only where Rule 57A(1) credit had been taken, except for processed fabrics received as input; read with the trade notice and Board clarification, this preserved actual duty-paid credit on partially processed fabrics while allowing deemed credit on the processed fabrics cleared. Denial of the benefit was therefore unsustainable, and the assessee was entitled to the claimed credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>