<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (7) TMI 691 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124120</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a case involving duty demand on goods produced by a 100% EOU and cleared to DTA units without duty payment. The Tribunal held that the demand for duty and penalties were not justified, citing lack of justification for invoking the extended period of limitation. The appeals were allowed based on the ground of limitation, with the Tribunal pronouncing the operative part of the order in open court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:19:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161077" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (7) TMI 691 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124120</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals in a case involving duty demand on goods produced by a 100% EOU and cleared to DTA units without duty payment. The Tribunal held that the demand for duty and penalties were not justified, citing lack of justification for invoking the extended period of limitation. The appeals were allowed based on the ground of limitation, with the Tribunal pronouncing the operative part of the order in open court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>