<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 476 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124113</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further review, emphasizing that interest liability is triggered only if duty is not paid within 5 days of bill return after assessment completion. It clarified that interest calculation is separate from the assessment process and contingent on duty payment timelines. The lower authorities were instructed to consider unjust enrichment and issue a comprehensive order after allowing the appellant to present their case, focusing on the assessment memorandum discrepancy and eligibility for refund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2012 16:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=161070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 476 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124113</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case for further review, emphasizing that interest liability is triggered only if duty is not paid within 5 days of bill return after assessment completion. It clarified that interest calculation is separate from the assessment process and contingent on duty payment timelines. The lower authorities were instructed to consider unjust enrichment and issue a comprehensive order after allowing the appellant to present their case, focusing on the assessment memorandum discrepancy and eligibility for refund.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=124113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>